Custom Search
|
|
Basic Step To Becoming A Successful Investor
Top financial channel -- along with its competitors -- will only make you dumber and poorer. This arrives like a shock to a lot of people. After all, financial channels offer a gentle stream of well-credentialed specialists, women and men with extraordinary titles from prestigious companies. Nearly everyone hold PhDs, years of practice, or manage huge sums of funds. They look good. They sound sharp. They have insightful thoughts plus reams of arcane investment data tripping off their tongues. How could listening to them perhaps make you a poorer trader? Since the unstated premise behind these shows -- that exist, certainly, to sell advertising -- is that investors need to be in a near-constant state of reaction: "The market is hitting a new high today. What should traders do now?" "The Fed has left interest rates unchanged. What should investors do now? "GNP was up an unexpectedly strong 3.8 percentage last quarter. What should investors do now?" They bring on an analyst with a bullish view and another with a bearish one -- on shares, bonds, currencies, commodities, rates of interest, or the economy -- allow them to square off for after sometime, followed by cut to commercials. A few minutes later, they come back and perform it some more. This goes on each day, week after week, year after year. Why do numerous brilliant, talented, educated people spend countless hours staring blankly at the tube? The quick answer, of course, is we enjoy it. But can we, really? Is watching TV more fulfilling than what you would be doing if you were not? If you get particular about it, you may feel somewhat ridiculous. For instance, have you ever told yourself something like: Gee, I actually need to find more exercise, however Dancing With the Stars is on in ten minutes. I promised my daughter I'd educate her how to play chess, but these Seinfeld re-runs are really funny. It's long past time I ended in to visit my aging grandmother, but I can't miss the game! I promised myself I would learn to play the piano this time, but this week will be finals of American Idol. I really do like to plant that garden. However I can't miss my soaps. If we're challenged, of course, we've got plenty of rationalizations. Let a Television critic inform you that many of the programming is senseless scrap and you will point to the learning stuff on The History Channel, Discovery, or National Geographic, regardless of whether that is only a part of what you watch. If he replies that you're still being subjected to several hours of commercials each week, you tell him you tape the programs and fast-forward through them. If he counters that taping just enables you to use more television, you could for all time play your trump card: "Mind your business." After all, you are an grownup. It is your life to survive. You can spend it any style you desire. However, between South Park and Grey's Anatomy, do you ever reflect on how you're spending it? No matter how good the programming is -- and let's face it, a number of it is superb -- or how rapidly you fast-forward with the commercials, the time you spend before the tube is time you have not spent pursuing your ambitions, living out your desires, or simply interacting with another human being. If you're elderly and companionless -- or housebound for some other reason -- that is different. But that doesn't describe the majority of us. Twenty-five years ago, Neil Postman warned of our consuming love affair with TV in Amusing Ourselves to Death. In book -- a jeremiad about the danger of turning serious conversations about politics, business, religion, and science into entertainment packages -- he argues that TV is generating not the dystopia of George Orwell's 1984 but rather of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World: "Religious devastation is more likely to appear from an enemy having a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate. In the Huxleyan prophecy, Big Brother doesn't watch us, by his option. We tend to watch him, by ours. There is no need for wardens or gates or Ministries of Truth. When a population becomes distracted by trivia, when cultural life is redefined like a perpetual round of entertainments, when serious public talk becomes a type of baby-talk, when, in short, a people become an audience and their public business a vaudeville act, then a nation finds itself at risk." He concludes that we'd all be better off if television got worse, not better. According to A.C. Nielsen, 99 percent of American households contain a television set. Two-thirds have above 3. These sets are on an average of 6 hours and 47 minutes per day. 49 percent of Americans polled say they spend too much time in front of the TV. It's not difficult to see why. The average viewer watches above 4 hours of Television daily. That is two months of non-stop TV-watching per year. For a 65-year life, an individual will have spent 9 years glued towards the tube. You by now know how little you'll gain by watching a lot TV. But have you also considered what it will be costing you? Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com Subscribe to the free Weekly Wealth Letter to learn the most powerful and valuable information about best performing stocks, funds and ETFs. Weekly Wealth Letter is loaded with unique insights and powerful resources for wealth building through smart investing. Click here to download your copy now. |
|