Custom Search
|
|
Creationism Vs Evolution Any Scientific Evolution Evidence
It would seem that since evolution is pushed by most scientists, (the media and schools do as well), Darwin's theory seems to come out the clear winner. But for those that have ‘dug beneath’ the information and charts that we have been shown in textbooks, the results can be quite shocking. Almost all of the ‘facts’ and illustrations in these textbooks supporting evolution have been disproved over the last number of years. Whether it is the fossil record, the ape-to man chart or various laws of science, all evidence seems to be running 180 degrees against Darwin's theory. In fact the majority of these have been exposed as junk science, hoaxes or simply contrary to all scientific methods and principles. Hundreds of scientists that have called themselves evolutionists in the past (sometimes secretly) have admitted serious flaws with the theory. Many have actually come out and admitted to the impossibility of the theory. That does not mean that they are necessarily turning to Intelligent Design or Creationism, but they are exposing the serious flaws with the theory. What are some of the flaws with the theroy that have been kept secret from us? 1. The record of the fossils is not what we have been told by our teachers. The earth layers (strata), we have been told, 'show us the order that creatures evolved'. What we are not told is that these layers are often out of order with some of the 'younger layers' being discovered below older layers. This is not unusual but is common around the world. And if that is not enough, the wrong fossils are discovered in every layer. 2. All things seem to decay and get worse, when left to themselves, not better. (This is a law of science called the second law of thermodynamics). Just the opposite would be required for Darwinism. Things would have to improve by themselves. Evolution directly contradicts this scientific law. 3. Mutations, 'the vehicle of evolution', are always harmful. They are harmful, deadly or at best neutral. They are 'genetic accidents' that always subtract genetic information from the organism or creature (One example of a mutation is Down's Syndrome). Although there may be temporary advantages for a mutation, the results are never good ultimately. By definition, mutations would be required to be beneficial consistently in order for evolution to be possible. These mutations would be required to be good in the past even though no science has ever shown this to be the case (on a permanent basis). Few of us, however, have ever been told about these serious flaws in the theory. They were kept from us. The majority of us are unaware that these 'facts' and illustrations in our textbooks that 'verify' Darwin's theory of evolution have been debunked decades ago (I can think of none that ‘hold water’ any more). Whether it is contradiction with scientific principles, faulty reasoning or just denial of scientific laws, the theory of evolution has bumped into serious contradictions with science concerning scientific laws, principles and methods over the last few decades. Why is it true that very few of us have heard of these problems? Because the majority of us have been taught from the same type of textbooks as well as from teachers that have learned from those textbooks. Evidence contrary to Darwinism is overwhelming. It is those that 'dig deeper' into the facts that will be able to find the numerous scientific flaws with the theory of evolution. Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com Next: discover more information about creationism vs evolution: any Scientific Evidence? Learn the numerous scientific facts that seem to have been kept from us in school. Discover more at evolutionguy.com Also get the special report: Did Humans Wive With Dinosaurs? |
|