Self Improvement Advice And Mind Development Training
This is not just a theory, either; scientists proved it well over three decades ago. They took two perfectly synchronised atomic clocks, one was kept stationary; the other was sent off flying around the world on a passenger jet airliner. When the two clocks were compared after the flight, the clock on the jet airliner was slower than that of the clock which had remained on the ground.
The popular misconception is that you have to be at, or close to the speed of light, for the time dilation effect to be experienced. But Einstein predicted only that the faster you travelled, the more noticeable the effect would be. This 1970’s experiment proved that any acceleration will cause a relative slowing of time.
What about travelling back in time, surely if we can travel forwards in time, then this must be considered just as possible. There are those who object to the theory of travelling backwards in time, their argument being if this was in fact possible; someone or something would surely have travelled back from the future by now. That is a reasonable objection; Einstein’s theories do not rule this out, but it is certainly far more difficult than travelling forwards in time.
Dr Ronald Mallet however, is convinced that the ability to travel backwards in time could be a reality within ten years. This theory is explained in his book, The Time Traveller.
Admittedly, we may not be sending objects or people back in time; we may be limited to information. But that would be hugely significant. In effect, he says that we would be making an early warning device, foretelling us of problems and disasters from the future that we could correct in the past, by taking or not taking certain steps and a little self-improvement advice..
Dr Mallet asserts that, just as speed affects time, so does gravity. He proposes an experiment to use light to control gravity, thus twisting time into a loop. With sufficient funding, he believes we could be seeing the effect of time loops within a single decade.
Of course, the funding is a problem. Dr Mallet requires around £120,000 to build the experiment in order to test the theory. Unfortunately he cannot convince any would be investors to part with their hard earned cash. Would a change in approach yield a more positive result?
Whilst a full blown transmitter and receiver experiment would most certainly prove or disprove this theory, all we really need to build is a receiver, in the hope that someone from the future will build a compatible transmitter.
Maybe we could all learn something from all of this. We are all tempted to focus on the really big projects, even though the scale and cost implications may mean the project never comes to fruition.
What we should be focusing on are the smaller, more manageable projects.
With property, and the stocks and shares markets currently in freefall, manufacturing industries in rapid decline, maybe now is that perfect time to look at the smaller picture. The home based business industry in complete contrast is going through a boom period. There are some very exciting and lucrative small start business opportunities out there, with minimal initial start-up investment requirements. With a small amount of re-training, coaching and self-improvement advice; any budding entrepreneurs amongst us, have the perfect opportunity to turn a current day small project into a future thriving business.
