Sam Vaknin's Articles in Legal

Environmental Legal
K-12 Education Creativity
Movie Reviews Digital Products
Consumer Electronics Book Reviews
Commentary History
Current Events Religion
Sexuality Divorce
Marriage Relationships
Destinations Outdoors
Babies Parenting
Forums Traffic Generation
SEO Security
Site Promotion Ebooks
Spam Mobile Phones
Networks Software
Goal Setting Leadership
Depression Women's Issues
Men's Issues Medicine
Philosophy Language
College Science
Sociology Psychology
Currency Trading Personal Finance
Taxes Stock Market
Loans Credit
Real Estate Investing
Wealth Building Entrepreneurs
Ethics Small Business
Networking Careers
Advertising Marketing
Sales Movies
Celebrities Photography
Poetry Humanities
Product Reviews Society
Home & Family Food & Beverage
Disease & Illness Reference & Education
Computers Finance
Internet Business Business
  • Corruption and Transparency
    The UNDP estimated, in 1997, that, even in rich, industrialized, countries, 15% of all firms had to pay bribes. The figure rises to 40% in Asia and 60% in Russia.
  • Ignorance and Punishment
    The fact that one is ignorant of the law does not a sufficient defence in a court of law make. Ignorance is no protection against punishment. The adult is presumed to know all the laws. This presumption is knowingly and clearly false. So why is it made in the first place?
  • Is the Narcissist Legally Insane?
    The narcissist suffers from uncontrollable rage and grandiose fantasies. Most narcissists are also mildly obsessive-compulsive. Yet, all narcissists should be held accountable to the vast and overwhelming majority of their actions.
  • Legalizing Crime
    The state has a monopoly on behaviour usually deemed criminal. It murders, kidnaps, and locks up people.
  • Money Laundering in A Changed World
    If you shop with a major bank, chances are that all the transactions in your account are scrutinized by AML (Anti Money Laundering) software.
  • Personality Disorders as an Insanity Defense
    The insanity defense (when a person is held not responsible for his criminal actions) rests on two pillars of evidence
  • Regulate the Internet!
    Laws and regulations passed and intermittently enforced against cybercrime attempt to prevent and constrain only a few obviously illegal acts. Spammers, spyware purveyors, child pornographers, and terrorists are the blatant tip of a much subtler iceberg of malicious and pernicious misconduct.
  • The Argument for Torture
    The problem of the "ticking bomb" - rediscovered after September 11 by Alan Dershowitz, a renowned criminal defense lawyer in the United States - is old hat. Should physical torture be applied - where psychological strain has failed - in order to discover the whereabouts of a ticking bomb and thus prevent a mass slaughter of the innocent?
  • The Demise of Intellectual Property
    In the mythology generated by capitalism to pacify the masses, the myth of intellectual property stands out. It goes like this: if the rights to intellectual property were not defined and enforced, commercial entrepreneurs would not have taken on the risks associated with publishing books, recording records, and preparing multimedia products.
  • The Insanity of the Defense
    If mental illness is culture-dependent and mostly serves as an organizing social principle - what should we make of the insanity defense (NGRI- Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity)?
  • The Rule of Law vs. Obedience to the Law
    Laws have to earn observance and obeisance.

© 2007 Article Dashboard. All Rights Reserved.
Use of our service is protected by our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service

Powered by Article Dashboard